Truth above all

Create your Newsoras account

Log in to Newsoras

Markets··3 min read·

Wisconsin Regulators Trim We Energies Rate Increase

Commission approves a smaller two-year electricity hike and lowers shareholder returns after a ten-hour hearing

Wisconsin Regulators Trim We Energies Rate Increase
Image: "1904 interuban railway bridge, Muskego, Wisconsin" by Aaron Volkening is licensed under CC BY 2.0. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/. — by
GO DEEPER WITH NEWSORAS

Understand this article deeper

A smaller increase than the utility sought

We Energies will raise electricity rates by about 7% across 2027 and 2028 under a vote taken Thursday by Wisconsin's Public Service Commission, marking the company's sixth straight increase. The utility projects that a typical household bill will climb by $7 to $8 a month next year and by $6 to $7 more in 2028. We Energies had originally asked for roughly 9% overall, including a 16% jump for residential customers.[S1][S2]

Much of the added revenue is earmarked for renewable generation, natural gas and battery storage, part of a capital spending plan the company says will grow by about $10 billion over five years. We Energies supplies more than a million customers in Wisconsin and in sections of Michigan and Illinois.[S1]

Commissioners question the cumulative burden

During a hearing that ran ten hours, commissioners argued that the utility's rates have risen faster than inflation for three consecutive years and that each increase cannot be justified in isolation. Kristy Nieto, a commissioner, said at the start of the session that the panel had to weigh whether the balance was right when customers face some of the region's highest rates while shareholders earn solid returns.[S1]

The commission reduced the increase on several fronts. It lowered the guaranteed rate of return that shareholders collect on each dollar invested and passed to ratepayers, setting it at 9.5% rather than the 9.9% We Energies requested. That gap is expected to save customers about $60 million over two years. Falling fuel costs at We Energies and other Wisconsin utilities also played a part.[S1]

Who pays for data center power

We Energies had proposed charging ratepayers for a quarter of the cost of new plants built to serve data center customers, offering to offset the expense with wholesale sales of surplus electricity. Commissioners rejected that approach a month later and ordered the construction costs assigned directly to current and future large data center customers.[S1]

A pending deal with Oracle, a partner in the Project Lighthouse campus in Port Washington, could spare other customers roughly $300 million in fuel costs over five years by giving the company a share of output from the Point Beach Nuclear Plant. The commission has not yet approved it. Transmission costs for data centers largely fall outside state jurisdiction and sit with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, which is weighing a proposal from the American Transmission Company that Microsoft has opposed.[S1]

Overspending and the political backdrop

Commissioners also moved to limit shareholder profit from a Kenosha County solar and battery project that We Energies bought from an independent developer for $433 million in 2022, with the solar farm operating from late 2024 and the battery following within a year. The vote came two days after Wisconsin voters handed Democrats control of the governorship and legislature for 2027, and the commission chair said she wants lawmakers to rewrite the state's utility rules.[S1]

Sources: VernonReporter · Gmtoday
SEE ANOTHER LENS
Portrait of Niccolò Machiavelli

Ask a Thinker about this article

GO DEEPER WITH NEWSORAS

Understand this article deeper

WHAT THEY'RE SAYING
  • I do not believe we can ignore the cumulative impact of years of increases simply because each individual increase can be explained by a particular investment or expense.
    Kristy NietoWisconsin Public Service Commission commissionervia VernonReporter

    Nieto opened the ten-hour hearing by arguing that regulators must weigh the combined effect of repeated rate increases on customers, not treat each one separately.

Comments

You'll comment as Anonymous. to comment with your username.
0/1500

Insults, spam and personal data are moderated.

    Log in to Newsoras

    Topics
    We EnergiesWisconsinelectricity ratesPublic Service Commissiondata centers
    End of the story

    Still have a question?

    Write it and Newsoras AI answers with this story's context.

    Or hear from · Free, no card.

    About the author

    Editor in charge · Political and economic analyst

    Alejandro Márquez is a political and economic analyst and an AI application developer. He runs Newsoras's historical-lens system and reviews every story before it goes out.

    NEWSORAS Editorial

    We stand for deep, verifiable, multi-perspective journalism. Our systems combine human reportage from leading agencies with synthetic intelligence to expose structural drivers.

    Create your Newsoras account

    Your email and a password. No card.

    Your free account includes

    • 5 questions a month to Newsoras AI
    • 1 question a month to the thinker you choose
    • Plus one extra welcome question, to try a second one
    • Answers grounded in the article, with its sources

    At least 8 characters.

    Free forever. No credit card.

    Already have an account?