Newsoras
Truth above all
Newsoras

Create your Newsoras account

Log in to Newsoras

World··2 min read·

USPS Finalizes Mail-In Voting Rule Despite Court Blocks

Postal Service publishes rule requiring states to share voter data, pending court rulings

USPS Finalizes Mail-In Voting Rule Despite Court Blocks
Image: Element5 Digital / Pexels — pexels
GO DEEPER WITH NEWSORAS

Understand this article deeper

Final Rule Published Amid Legal Challenges

The USPS has released a 95-page final rule on mail-in voting, even though federal courts have issued injunctions against it. This rule, published on Friday, will officially appear in the Federal Register on August 26. It originates from President Donald Trump's executive order in March, instructing the USPS to create new regulations for mail voting. Despite legal challenges, the USPS is moving forward with these changes, which could impact the distribution of mail-in ballots and require states to provide voter records and redesign ballot envelopes.[S1][S3]

The USPS has outlined a new regulation that mandates states to supply lists of mail-in ballot requesters, complete with tracking barcodes. This information will feed into a Federal Ballot Mail Portal, generating participation lists. States failing to adhere to these requirements will have their ballots rejected by the USPS for delivery.[S1][S3][S5]

Court Injunctions and Administration's Push

Two court orders, one from Judge Indira Talwani in Boston and another from California, currently prevent the USPS from enforcing the new rule. Judge Talwani's August 11 decision deemed the executive order potentially unconstitutional, as the right to vote takes precedence over the executive's involvement in election oversight. The Justice Department is now waiting for the Supreme Court to decide whether to lift these injunctions.[S1][S3][S5]

The USPS has released a final rule, stating it will only enforce the restrictions if the court injunctions are removed. This means the rule could be implemented swiftly if the Supreme Court intervenes, giving states a tight timeframe to adapt before the election. The administration is currently in legal battles with 30 states and Washington DC over their refusal to provide voter lists.[S2][S3][S6]

Criticism and Defense

Critics, including voting rights advocates and Democratic lawmakers, have slammed the move, accusing the Trump administration of weaponizing the USPS to exert federal control over elections. Michael McNulty of Issue One said the rule would turn postal workers into federal gatekeepers, rejecting ballots that do not meet new requirements. Voting rights advocate Marc Elias wrote on social media that USPS caved to Trump.[S1][S5]

Postmaster General David Steiner supports the proposal, claiming it guarantees that ballots issued align with states' expectations. The rule's wording suggests it will aid in enforcing federal law and support law enforcement, even though postal staff won't scrutinize ballot contents. President Trump has repeatedly alleged, without substantiation, that mail-in voting is prone to fraud, despite research indicating that such fraud is extremely uncommon.[S1][S3][S6]

Sources: Al Jazeera · Theguardian · Eciks · Devdiscourse · DemocracydocketView sources
SEE ANOTHER LENS
Portrait of Niccolò Machiavelli

Ask a Thinker about this article

GO DEEPER WITH NEWSORAS

Understand this article deeper

WHAT THEY'RE SAYING
  • Where [Trump’s executive order] is presently causing confusion and threatening both increasing chaos and an erosion of trust in our democracy, the court finds that enfranchisement heavily outweighs the executive’s attempt to unconstitutionally insert itself into the domain of election regulation.
    Indira TalwaniU.S. District Judgevia Al Jazeera

    Judge Talwani explaining her decision to block the rule, citing constitutional concerns and the need to protect voter trust.

  • Yesterday’s new mail-in voting rule is an attempt to weaponize USPS as part of the Trump administration’s efforts to take over elections.
    Michael McNultySenior policy director for Issue Onevia Democracydocket

    McNulty criticizing the rule as a federal overreach that would give USPS authority to reject ballots.

Topics
USPSmail-in votingTrumpelection integrityvoting rights
End of the story

Still have a question?

Write it and Newsoras AI answers with this story's context.

Or hear from · Free, no card.

About the author

Editor in charge · Political and economic analyst

Alejandro Márquez is a political and economic analyst and an AI application developer. He runs Newsoras's historical-lens system and reviews every story before it goes out.

NEWSORAS Editorial

We stand for deep, verifiable, multi-perspective journalism. Our systems combine human reportage from leading agencies with synthetic intelligence to expose structural drivers.

Newsoras

Create your free account

Your email and a password. No card.

Your free account includes

  • 5 questions a month to Newsoras AI
  • 1 question a month to the thinker you choose
  • Plus one extra welcome question, to try a second one
  • Answers grounded in the article, with its sources

At least 8 characters.

Free forever. No credit card.

Already have an account?