Truth above all

Create your Newsoras account

Log in to Newsoras

World··3 min read·

Burnham seeks candid public debate on EU free movement

The prime minister says Britain should weigh the evidence on mobility with Brussels before any shift in the relationship.

Burnham seeks candid public debate on EU free movement
Image: Ivan Dražić / Pexels — pexels
GO DEEPER WITH NEWSORAS

Understand this article deeper

A call for a factual debate on mobility

Andy Burnham has said he wants a candid, evidence-led conversation with the British public about whether free movement between the UK and the EU could be restored, as part of his thinking on a fresh relationship with the bloc. In an interview with the Sunday Times, he argued the subject deserves a debate grounded in facts rather than assumption.[S1][S2][S3][S4][S5][S6][S7]

The prime minister has spoken openly about wanting to revisit Britain's ties with Brussels, suggesting a new arrangement could see the UK go all the way and rejoin the EU. Other paths he has raised include single market membership, which would entail accepting free movement, or joining the customs union. Each would mean agreeing to rules set in Brussels.[S1]

Manifesto limits and the road to 2029

Burnham had earlier committed himself to the limits set out in Labour's 2024 election platform, which ruled out restoring free movement, joining the single market or entering a customs union. Because of that pledge, a major overhaul of the UK-EU relationship would most likely be deferred until a general election takes place, with the next one anticipated around 2029.[S1]

He has said he will use the period around a summit with EU leaders in Brussels on 20 November to set out for the British public the different options for the future relationship. He added that he could not envisage recommending that the UK join the Schengen Area, where border checks have been removed, or abandon the pound for the euro.[S1]

Migration then and now

The prime minister conceded that free movement carried very significant difficulties, but suggested European migration had altered over the past decade. He described the earlier pattern as a kind of immigration that may have been less troublesome than today's, contrasting revolving-door movement, in which people arrived and later left, with the current picture. He said the balance of migration had shifted since then.[S1]

He also pointed to reciprocal gains for Britons under free movement, especially young people eager to live in Europe. Migration dominated the 2016 referendum campaign. In the year to June 2016, the month of the leave vote, net migration stood at a near-record 335,000, according to the Office for National Statistics.[S1]

Later decisions produced far higher figures. Net migration reached a record 944,000 in the year to March 2023, driven by a surge of foreign workers encouraged to come by Boris Johnson's Conservative government as the country emerged from the Covid pandemic. It has since fallen sharply, dropping to 171,000 last year, well below pre-Brexit levels and almost half the 2016 figure.[S1]

Opposition from Farage and the Tories

Nigel Farage, leader of Reform UK, described the prime minister's remarks as a total betrayal of voters who backed Brexit, including those in Burnham's Makerfield constituency. He also dismissed as deluded the suggestion that immigration had been different while Britain was an EU member, and said his party would fight what he called dishonesty.[S1]

Chris Philp, the Conservative shadow home secretary, argued that returning to EU free movement would mean surrendering control of the borders and permitting uncontrolled migration from across Europe. He said the British people had voted to end free movement and that there could be no return to it.[S1]

Sources: Theguardian · Mezha · AOL · Independent · IE · Dailymail · Thetimes
SEE ANOTHER LENS
Portrait of Niccolò Machiavelli

Ask a Thinker about this article

GO DEEPER WITH NEWSORAS

Understand this article deeper

WHAT THEY'RE SAYING
  • I think you have to have a very factual, quite evidence-based debate about this.
    Andy BurnhamPrime ministervia Theguardian

    Burnham sets out why he believes the question of free movement with the EU should be argued on facts rather than sentiment.

  • He is also deluded to say immigration was different when we were members of the EU. We will fight this dishonesty.
    Nigel FarageLeader of Reform UKvia Theguardian

    Farage rejects Burnham's claim that migration looked different during EU membership and vows to campaign against his approach.

  • The British people voted to end free movement, and there can be no return to it.
    Chris PhilpConservative shadow home secretaryvia Theguardian

    Philp frames the 2016 vote as a settled decision against free movement that should not be reopened.

Comments

You'll comment as Anonymous. to comment with your username.
0/1500

Insults, spam and personal data are moderated.

    Log in to Newsoras

    Topics
    Andy BurnhamEU free movementBrexitUK migrationBrussels summit
    End of the story

    Still have a question?

    Write it and Newsoras AI answers with this story's context.

    Or hear from · Free, no card.

    About the author

    Editorial reviewer

    Adelo Vieira is part of the Newsoras editorial team and reviews stories before they go out.

    NEWSORAS Editorial

    We stand for deep, verifiable, multi-perspective journalism. Our systems combine human reportage from leading agencies with synthetic intelligence to expose structural drivers.

    Create your free account

    Your email and a password. No card.

    Your free account includes

    • 5 questions a month to Newsoras AI
    • 1 question a month to the thinker you choose
    • Plus one extra welcome question, to try a second one
    • Answers grounded in the article, with its sources

    At least 8 characters.

    Free forever. No credit card.

    Already have an account?