Truth above all

Create your Newsoras account

Log in to Newsoras

Argentina··2 min read·

US judge blocks $100,000 H-1B visa fee

A federal judge in California suspends the Trump administration's $100,000 charge on new H-1B petitions, citing procedural failures.

US judge blocks $100,000 H-1B visa fee
Image: Tara Winstead / Pexels — pexels
GO DEEPER WITH NEWSORAS

Understand this article deeper

Judge Gilliam suspends the $100,000 H-1B fee

A federal judge in California on Wednesday suspended the Trump administration's policy that required employers to pay $100,000 for each new H-1B visa petition. Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr. of the Federal District Court for the Northern District of California ruled that immigration agencies implemented the fee without following the procedures required by law. The judge partially granted a request for a preliminary injunction filed by several companies and organizations that challenged the legality of the charge, which President Donald Trump proclaimed in September 2025.[S1]

The ruling orders the policies through which the Department of Homeland Security and other authorities implemented the payment to be vacated and returned to the agencies. It also prohibits the agencies and those acting under their direction from continuing to apply the policies until they complete a notice-and-comment process under the Administrative Procedure Act. The magistrate concluded that the plaintiffs are likely to demonstrate that the agencies acted in an arbitrary and capricious manner by failing to study alternatives or the interests of the affected entities before imposing the new requirement.[S2]

The judge also determined that the government failed to meet its obligation to subject these policies to a public participation process, given that without those agency rules the $100,000 charge could not be applied. Trump's proclamation, signed on September 19, 2025, established the additional $100,000 payment for new H-1B petitions and was extended by the president on September 18 until September 2027. The government justified the measure at the time as a response to the alleged systemic abuse of the visa program for specialized foreign workers.[S2]

The case thus faces conflicting judicial decisions: while a federal court in Washington confirmed in 2025 the president's authority to impose the charge, federal courts in Massachusetts and now California have suspended the policies used to apply it.[S2]

Sources: Clarin · InfobaeView sources →
Portrait of Montesquieu

Ask a Thinker about this article

GO DEEPER WITH NEWSORAS

Understand this article deeper

Topics
H-1B visaDonald Trumpimmigration policyfederal courtCalifornia
End of the story

Still have a question?

Write it and Newsoras AI answers with this story's context.

Or hear from · Free, no card.

About the author

Editorial reviewer

Adelo Vieira is part of the Newsoras editorial team and reviews stories before they go out.

NEWSORAS Editorial

We stand for deep, verifiable, multi-perspective journalism. Our systems combine human reportage from leading agencies with synthetic intelligence to expose structural drivers.

Create your free account

Your email and a password. No card.

Your free account includes

  • 5 questions a month to Newsoras AI
  • 1 question a month to the thinker you choose
  • Plus one extra welcome question, to try a second one
  • Answers grounded in the article, with its sources

At least 8 characters.

Free forever. No credit card.

Already have an account?